SuicidalUtopia.com

Jay Busse (idiot savant) writes words, gives opinions and looks forward to your opinions. I am not a journalist, which puts me ahead of many the blabbering, self-inflating bobbleheads spewing "news" at us on TV. Because I actually realize I'm not a journalist. Suicidal Utopia: For peeple that rede gud.

Socialism Sucks/Why I'm Now A Great American and not Sucky

I've decided it's just easier to join'm than fight'm.

So, as of today, I'm anti-everything socialist. It's just easier to align with a group and let them do the thinking for me.

This library "thing" has gotten out of control. The people shouldn't be put-upon to finance socialist libraries. If we're not careful we may end-up with a literate electorate and there is no evidence that intelligence will improve the plight of the 7 billion stupid people.

The same arguments can be applied to our socialist education system. Here, there is evidence that it's not working and should be abolished. The irrefutable evidence is the billions of fucktards inhabiting Earth and their increasing fucktardiness.

This next one really squeegees my balls: Why, in the name of the almighty Spam, do people get tax breaks for breeding? This seems to be the inverse of logic. We plop our little miracles onto the planet and they put a burden on the system. More miracles=more burden=more cost.

They want education, libraries, police protection, food, clothing, shelter and medical care. Basically these little miracles are demanding socialism and I for one will not stand for it!

Shouldn't the breeders pay their fair share? Should they shoulder burden they've created? This is just tripendicular logic-defying socialism dude! I don't want to subsidize your children. You plopped'em, you pay for'em.

Look at how great the free market system has done with energy: I mean Enron worked people. It's goal was to suck money from the people and it did. It sucked in the way the free-market was meant to suck. Sucking is good. Sucking works. (paraphrased from the movie Wall Street).

Seriously, are we going to regulate sucking next? No way. We not only won't stand for regulating sucking, we will continue to reward sucking as we did with the bailout and the wondrously gluttoness execs that functioned exceptionally well as the iceberg to our Titanic.

Which leads me to water. Why do I need to care about other people's water? I don't want to drink socialist water.

Massive sucking equals massive profits.

Now, while I applaud the unbridled enthusiasm for their own wealth, I must say this does not make really, really rich people; really, really smart. They neglected to foresee the need for an infinite system of sucking.

Their system sucked tremendously, but it was finite, like a juggler hanging from balloons at 30 thousand feet, it can't go on forever. The juggler will come back to Earth (with a Splat!).

We need to get our really, really rich people working with those smug, smart people to create a product people will buy until the apocalypse, or rapture, or end of days, or the plague, or the four horsemen, or any number of mythical Beings come back from wherever the hell they are to destroy us.

So we use these smug-smart people to think about stuff and the rich people finance it and the middle class works and buys the stuff created by the smart guys, financed by the rich dudes.

I saw this word in the ruins of a once great civilization: "Manufacturing", it's been partially deciphered and it seems that when you produce products, you employ people and they derive d-i-g-n-i-t-y (very obscure word, sorry) from producing a product people want to buy.

Therefore the really, really rich dudes don't have to resort to extortion or theft or creating their wealth with magic bubbles, with money that doesn't exist to insure their wealth.

People "want" to give you their money for a product they want.

As I type this an entrepreneurial opportunity has birthed in my brain: Why not start a healthcare company to destroy all others. There is no doubt the competition is fierce, these companies are great at sucking.

What if our company was super-funded and not-for-profit. First, let me assuage the gluttons: There will be gluttony. Please hear me out.

Our company provides a superior product at an affordable price. We even come across as compassionate suckers. AND it's a product that will be sold as long as humanity survives. Guaranteeing gluttoness sucking in perpetuity.

OK, so we provide health care to everyone. We need to be nearly nationwide to make this work. We adopt this saying some former society said about "give us your poor, your... whatever" tagline and people crying in our commercials. Tears of joy, tears of massively sucky joy.

Now, it should be noted the health insurance companies will not go quietly. They will scream like banshees and we will need to grease the wheels in Washington. But, if we go with our current business model we can crush the competition with all the billions of dollars we'll have to grease the wheels of Washington.

I am not smart enough to run the company, but I wouldn't mind being like the Regional President of Moral Compass?

Not-for-profit doesn't mean we don't make money, it means we split any money left over so we don't have any profits... in perpetuity.

Now, in order to come-off as compassionate we will need to absorb some hits. We will not be able to deny doctor recommended procedures or deny admittance based on preexisting conditions.

This only works if most of us get in the pool. The healthy today are the sick, sucky bastards of tomorrow. We need to serve the sick, sucky old bastards as well as the young soon to be sick, sucky old bastards.

This guarantees our company will suck forever.

Simply: If you have a rich (click here for gold) member of your family and they don't want to see you die. They assist you with medical costs as they would hope people don't unassist the rich old bastard if he gets sick and actually assist with his death so they can inherit his money to save the person the bastard wasn't willing to help save.

So, this is like a big dysfunctional family pulling together to help each other, but not in a socialist way, but a not-for-profit way (don't tell the common folk we're gonna split the left over money so there are no profits).

We're also going to use our public compassionate persona and provide a superior product which will destroy our enemies and insure us a monopoly (come-on-free-market people "monopoly" gives you a stiffy) forever.

This is the free market system at work: Major sucking and, as a bonus, it lasts forever.

Less upfront money, but big residuals: Your working stiffs will work longer before dying, and they will be replaced by new healthy working stiffs and when they die, their relatives will clamor to work for either our health care company or your manufacturing venture, because we're compassionate.

I hope I have recused myself of the label: socialist. As I have offered a free-market monopoly on healthcare and exposed major sucking as magical economic bubbles of cash as good, but finite.

I'm baffled as to my own major sucking and lack of financial success? Why doesn't inverse logic work for me?

I suck, therefore I should succeed.

Your tags:

Comments (0):

  • No comments found.
Post a New Comment
Your Name:
Your Email:
Comment:

buy unique gifts at Zazzle
Fight World Hunger Sean Penn - Fights World Hunger Help Haiti Shop against Hunger
The Hunger Site